Casper Star-Tribune Online - my.trib.com
Sat, Nov 21, 2009 Welcome ! Sign Out | Account Settings | HELP
HomeNewsSportsFeaturesWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy TribMy CityMultimediaJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search E-Edition
 
Rate This Blog
0 rating(s)
Latest Entries
Loading...
Links
Loading...
Loading...
Search:
Cale Case from the Legislature
State Senator Cale Case's Legislative Blog
Dead Bills Piling Up Here
Posted by: Cale Case on March 1, 2008 at 10:52PM EST

The body count is piling up. There are now almost as many dead bills as there are live ones here. That is no doubt a very good thing. One of the bill bodies is mine.

We are almost to that magic day: Monday will be the last day for bills in Committee of the Whole in the second house. Any bill that is not through Committee of the Whole by the end of Monday is dead. Many bills are already dead: Adult adoption, Driving with Headlights, Welfare Drug Screening, Salvage Yards-Restrictions, Governmental Immunity Vanpools, Small Employer Health Insurance (that’s mine), And about 120 others languish in Bill Neverland, where they will never grow up to be laws…at least this year. The old saying here is that good ideas come back and hopefully we won’t see any of the dogs again.

Now the name of the game is conference committees. Any legislation must be passed in an identical form by both houses. When the second house makes a change to a bill that came over from the originating house, the bill goes back to the originating house for approval of the changes. If the originating house does not approve, a conference committee of three members is appointed to meet with a like committee from the second house and come up with a changes acceptable to both houses.

A lot can happen in the conference committee process. The first committee is bound to try to work within the differences between the two houses and try to come up with a proposed report that is taken back to each house to try to get approval. If they can’t reach and agreement or the agreement is turned down by one of the houses, a new committee will be appointed. The new committee members may be the same or different and the committee may be appointed as a “free committee” that can bring back a proposed compromise outside of the strict boundaries of the differences between both houses. Conference committees happen fast. Notice requirements are by necessity less rigorous than for a standing committee meeting. Getting people together for a meeting is difficult during the chaotic last week. A person following a bill has to be on their toes too.

The budget has a special conference committee of five members from each house, rather than the normal three. Usually, the Senate appoints all of the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee to be the Senate Budget Conference Committee. There is a lot of fuss and bluss with the budget conference committee, but the truth is that the budget differences are worked out and the budget is fast approved almost every time. It has been quite a while since a second conference committee has had to be appointed on the budget. I figure that by this time in the session, folks start getting in the mind to go home, and with all the money we have had the last few years, there is little mood for a real fight. On Friday, the budget conference worked out the same way, and the approved Budget Bill will be signed and sent down for the Governor’s signature.

I’m chairing the conference committee on the Senate File 11: Subdivisions – Large Acre Parcels. This is an important bill and it is the one that the some of the realtors and others back home in Fremont County do not like, while others at home like it a lot. Jayne Mockler and Bill Landen are also on the committee from the Senate. This is a good combination. Jayne is a great legislator and Bill is proving himself a very capable new Senator. The House has not appointed their committee yet, so stay tuned for the assessment on that side. I doubt if the activities of the conference committee will generate much attention, but that bill is one of the biggies this year.

Send This | Categories:
(5) Comments
Posted by: Jan on March 3, 2008 10:57PM EST
Isn't it funny how Mr. Case, who claims to be a libertarian, is pushing Senate File 11, which regulates what people can do with their private property. Oh, wait, I forgot: Mr. Case only wants big money corporations to have more freedom! Us little people can go hang.

Posted by: Brett Glass on March 4, 2008 7:37PM EST
Jan, you must understand that Cale sees his current position as chairman of the Senate Corporations Committee as a key stepping stone to the Governorship in two years. He could use the support of county commissioners and city and county governments, and this would certainly motivate him to violate his own stated principles so as to grease the skids for a campaign.

Posted by: Wyosavvy on March 5, 2008 11:44AM EST
Mr. Case, sorry to ask another inconvenient question, but if it is really true that you are intending to try to run for Governor as mentioned above (or even for re-election to the Senate), how could you possibly have voted against HB 73? Do you believe that people should have the right to drive drunk? Do you think our state would be well served by having a Governor who didn't want to lock up drunk drivers after a THIRD offense? I think that this vote disqualifies you for re-election as dog catcher, much less as Governor.

Posted by: Anonymous on March 12, 2008 12:13PM EST
Oh give us a break. You whiney boys have too much time on your hands. Don’t you know that Cale Case is the one who put through and maintained the pro-property 10 parcel exemption for family operations? Then he brokered the compromise that kept this important property rights compromise in the law after the House of Representatives reduced its effectiveness. Everyone, ranchers, realtors, county commissioners and advocacy groups, all said that his actions made the bill better!

And I also suppose that you do not know or are not telling the story of Wyoming’s DUI laws which are pretty much in line with our surrounding states and the nation. Wyoming’s DUI laws have been tightened up five times in the past eight years. Case was the first legislator to break a logjam of inaction when he successfully amended the penalties for a mandatory jail term for a third offense.

Wyoming has more folks incarcerated than 25 states and the US leads the free world in locking up its citizens. So why is it that all that you Einsteins can come up with is to throw folks in prison? Judges are not imposing the maximum sentences now, explain how removing their discretion will improve justice. Prison does not deal with addiction. Prison permanently teaches people to stay on the edge of society.

Cale Case will make a great Governor.

Posted by: Lander Mom on March 20, 2008 5:30PM EST
Case voted against penalties for drunk drivers, and for that he loses my vote not only for Governor but for the Legislature next time around. We have much more decent folk in this city to elect to both offices.

Loading...